Advertising - LEO without ads? LEO Pur
LEO

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker.

Would you like to support LEO?

Disable your ad blocker for LEO or make a donation.

 
  •  
  • Topic

    cannot vs. can not

    Comment
    identical?
    differences?
    US vs British?
    Authordj20 Dec 04, 11:07
    Comment
    the 'difference' between the two is that 'can not' is not correct English, whereas cannot is.

    M-W: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Di...
    AHD: http://www.bartleby.com/61/15/C0071500.html
    #1Authorodondon irl20 Dec 04, 11:21
    Comment
    I am fully aware that the two-word construction "can not" is often used where the opposite of "can" (=cannot) is intended. Despite the ubiquity of this usage, it is still an error.

    Indeed there are differences! What we should use when we mean "are unable to" or "are not permitted to" is one word: cannot. This is the word that we contract when we write "can't." It is a common error to separate "can" and "not." The American Heritage Dictionary is quite clear on this point: cannot is the negative form of the word can.

    Here's one example I use:
    If I say "I cannot smoke," I mean that I am unable to or not permitted to smoke. If I say, "I can not smoke," not modifies smoke. My meaning is: "I am able to not smoke," i.e., I have the ability to avoid smoking, to prevent myself from smoking, or to stop smoking.

    Another example:
    If I am unable to go or am not permitted to go, I should write, "I cannot go." If I have a choice between going and not going, I may write, "I can go, or I can not go – it is my choice."

    #2AuthorR.20 Dec 04, 12:34
    Comment
    This sounds a bit far fetched, I think. I would never say I can not go. Having the choice I'd rather say I may go - or I may not, I haven't made up my mind. Or, if I want to express my freedom of choice: I'm free to go anywhere.
    #3AuthorSalisbury20 Dec 04, 14:05
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt