| Kommentar | @ 20 - And they are culturally what they are. Nothing more, nothing less. Nuh uh: They are also culturally what they become, which is an important distinction. And how fashionable a particular name is at any given time is an important marker, too; when I was very young, there was a large influx of immigrants at my school who needed or wanted to take "American" names, but for some reason tended toward names that made them sound like they had dropped out of the 1940s, which by then gave them a whiff of the grandmotherly: Ethel, Mabel, Edna, Irma, Ida.
I knew a woman named Gay when I was a kid, too, but she was also at least two hundred years old, or so I thought at the time. She was probably 50. Sigh.
@ 31 - Ha! That's a new one for me. Never thought about it from the other perspective. |
|---|