Advertising
LEO

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker.

Would you like to support LEO?

Disable your ad blocker for LEO or make a donation.

 
  •  
  • Topic

    englische Maße

    Comment
    Kennt jemand eine Homepage/ einen Link, in der die englischen maße in metrische Maße umgerehchnet sind, wie z.B. 1 Fuß = 30,48 cm, 1 Meile = 1,608 km etc, auch für Gewichte und Volumina etc würde mich das interessieren
    AuthorLöwe18 Oct 05, 14:19
    Comment
    einfach mal googlen - ich hatte vorher Glück mit gallone+liter+umrechnung - da waren ein Haufen sinnvoller Treffer dabei
    #1Authorrenke18 Oct 05, 14:21
    Comment
    Ich kann die Webseite nicht erinnern, aber es heisst 'Conversion Calculator'. Du könntest das auch googeln
    #2Authorjoe18 Oct 05, 14:23
    Comment
    Ja, da hab' ich was:

    http://www.unitconversion.org/

    Viel Spaß! ;-)
    #3AuthorFirefighter18 Oct 05, 14:24
    Comment
    onlineconversion.com
    #4Authorjulia18 Oct 05, 14:25
    Comment
    Google.

    Einfach mal bei Google als Suche z.B. 20 ft eingeben. Voila.

    Müsste auch mit anderen Maßen gehen, habe ich aber noch nicht probiert.
    #5AuthorJalapeno18 Oct 05, 14:27
    Comment
    Wow, bevor ich meinen Eintag selbst lesen kann, sind schon 4 Antworten da!! Danke!
    #6AuthorLöwe18 Oct 05, 14:27
    Comment
    Die meisten Angaben findest Du auch direkt hier im Leo! Gib doch z.B. einfahc mal gallon oder foot etc. ein und du bekommst die passende Entsprechung mit Umrechnungsangabe.
    #7Authorrikestoe18 Oct 05, 14:28
    Comment
    Please forgive me for being slightly off-topic but this is forum is, after all, called "general discussion")...

    "English measurements"???!!!

    The mesaurements you're talking about (feet, inches, miles etc) are/were used throughout the English-speaking world, not just in England or the UK.

    They were not "invented" by the English/British, either. Most of them date back to Roman times. Some go back even further to the ancient Egyptians!
    #8AuthorPLS (UK/De)18 Oct 05, 14:36
    Comment
    So, habe eben auch andere Maße bei Google probiert. Hat alles geklappt

    20 square feet
    20 gallons
    20 miles
    20 yards
    20 acres
    20 cubic feet

    Ich vermute fast, das geht mit allem.

    Für mich die bequemste Variante, man muss ich keine eigene Seite merken / eigenen Link anlegen.
    #9AuthorJalapeno18 Oct 05, 14:45
    Comment
    Hat nur indirekt mit Maßen zu tun, aber...:
    Wisst ihr, wo man einen Messbecher mit englischen Maßen herkriegt?
    M&S hat keinen, Sainsbury auch nicht, CostCutters sowieso nicht...
    #10AuthorFelix18 Oct 05, 15:35
    Comment
    #11Authorbaba18 Oct 05, 15:48
    Comment
    Felix: try Wilkinsons...
    #12Authorhein18 Oct 05, 16:15
    Comment
    Wie weit ist die Metrification in GB inzwischen eigentlich fortgeschritten? Werden überwiegend noch "Imperial" Maße verwendet, oder schon metrische? Es würde mich auch interessieren, welche Bereiche ausgenommen sind. So sieht man m.E. an Tankstellen heute keine Gallons mehr, sondern Liter, aber im Pub gibt es noch pints.
    #13AuthorN.D.18 Oct 05, 17:46
    Comment
    http://members.aol.com/JackProot/met/spvolas.html
    (Anglo-Saxon weights & measures.Summary of this page: How the system emerged, and its long history. Its (very) many different units. Whys and whens.)

    Total coole Liste aller möglichen Maßeinheiten die in der englischen Sprache (UK, US und andere) verwendet werden, mit kurzen Artikeln zur Geschichte der Maßeinheit. Enjoy!
    #14AuthorGismo18 Oct 05, 18:06
    Comment
    Interessant ist auch diese Seite: http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/

    Es gibt seitens der USA immer wieder Absichtserklärungen und auch Bundesgesetze*, auf das metrische System zu konvertieren. Aber so richtig ernst nimmt das niemand. Ich bin deshalb immer wieder im Clinch mit meinen US-Kollegen, weil ich natürlich nicht im Traum daran denke, meine technischen Unterlagen im Inch-pound-System zu erstellen (nicht zu verwechseln mit Unterlagen für Kunden).

    * Metric Conversion Act of 1975, amended by the Omnibus and Competitiveness Act of 1988. Siehe http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/laws/inde...
    #15AuthorChris_791 (AT)19 Oct 05, 06:36
    Comment
    Mein Tip(p) für die Umrechnung von Maßen, Gewichten etc.:

    http://hemsidor.torget.se/users/b/bohjohan/co...
    #16Authorwoody19 Oct 05, 07:20
    Comment
    Solche Listen findet man auch jeweils ganz vorne oder ganz hinten in jedem besseren Wörterbuch. Der Langenscheidt z. B. hat immer Listen mit Umrechnungstabellen gehabt, auch für Temperaturen (Celsius / Fahrenheit usw).
    #17AuthorKatharina19 Oct 05, 07:20
    Comment
    @ N.D.
    In Enlgand, in many instances both are still used. For example most greengrocers/suprmarkets show the price of fruit and veg in both pounds per 100g/1kg and pounds per pound (lb) and as you said, most petrol stations no longer show gallons and pubs serve pints. Likewise, most supermarkets still sell milk by the pint (or multiple thereof) but legally have to also put how many litres this is on the container, but then some producers, like the one in my local shop only put litres on.
    Many older people prefer imperial, as that is what they grew up with, whereas now people learn metric in school, although to accomodate school and my mum, I can do both and even do rough conversions for many of them in my head, especially grams and ounces - recipes are such fun!
    Anyone else remember the greengrocer who was sent to prison a few years ago in England because he refused to show the metric prices. He argued that all his customers were old and wanted imperial, so he didn't bother putting metric too and when he refused to add metric prices he was sent to prison, but I can't remember for how long.
    *rant start* that's what wonderful European legislation does in Britain *rant over*
    #18Authorjoe19 Oct 05, 07:41
    Comment
    Have since googled it, 1991, Steve Thoburn.
    I think laws are laws, but life wouldn't be the same without the old fashioned market traders 'TWO POUND A POUND O' BANANAS' - although I have no idea whether that is a stupidly expensive example, before anyone cries me down, I don't like bananas!

    http://www.metric.org.uk/press/ar010121.htm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2129528.stm
    #19Authorjoe19 Oct 05, 07:46
    Comment
    Thanks, it will be intersting to see whether the imperial measures will disappear some day, that would be sad I think.
    #20AuthorN.D.19 Oct 05, 08:10
    Comment
    #21Authorbienchen (de)19 Oct 05, 08:14
    Comment
    Bei der Seite http://www.convert-me.com kann man alle möglichen Sachen "umwandeln".
    #22Authorrani19 Oct 05, 09:01
    Comment
    Bei solchen Zahlen habe ich das gerne immer schriftlichzum Nachschauen und da kann ich Dir nicht onlin den großen Pons empfehlen, da hast Du es auf ein paar Seiten auch differenziert, auch nach Britischem und Amerikanischem System.
    #23AuthorLeo19 Oct 05, 09:31
    Comment
    Does anybody else from the UK have a theory on this:
    Why do you reckon some imperial measurments are used much more than others? For example 'yards' are relatively rarely used (I'd say people would be more likely to say "200 metres down the road" than 200 yds) but on the other hand more people talk about miles than km, and nobody knows their height in cm - I'm 5'10", not 178cm!!!
    #24AuthorTim19 Oct 05, 09:51
    Comment
    Ganz gut ist auch noch:

    unit-converter.org

    Die Seite ist auch auf englisch und französisch verfügbar.


    Grüße!
    Johannes
    #25AuthorJohannes17 Oct 07, 17:59
    Comment
    wenn ich's so schreibe, dann klappt's auch mit dem link:

    http://www.unit-converter.org
    #26AuthorJohannes17 Oct 07, 18:01
    Comment
    Google converts most things automatically.

    One of my favourites is:

    5 dozen attoParsecs per fortnight in furlongs per century


    #27AuthorMikeE (236602) 17 Oct 07, 20:24
    Comment
    @ MikeE

    24.0102226 ?
    Although I have no idea what that represents...
    #28AuthorHanna <AE>17 Oct 07, 20:31
    Comment
    @Hanna

    Well, of course, it represents 60 attoParsecs per fortnight (or 30 attoParsecs per week), converted into in furlongs per century! (;-).

    I admit, it is not very often used, but a Parsec is an astronomical measurement of length equivalent to about 3.262 light-years, and the prefix "atto-" means: "divided by 1000000000000000000. A furlong is, of course, 10 chains (a chain being 4 rods).

    HTH
    (:-)
    #29AuthorMikeE (236602) 17 Oct 07, 20:54
    Comment
    #30AuthorOrsiris (379716) 17 Oct 07, 21:54
    Comment
    As George Orwell wrote, a liter is too much and a half a liter is too little. There are many other problems I find with the metric system that make it unintuitive for daily use by most people.


    Length:
    What do most people use that is a meter long? broomsticks? What good is a millimeter to most people? Even a single centimeter is too little to be of much use for most practical purposes.

    In contrast, a foot (about as long as your wrist to your elbow) has 12 inches and can be divided into 2, 3, 4, and 6 inch fractions. 10 can only be reasonably divided by 2 and 5. Also, and inch can be divided into 1/2, 1/4 1/8, 1/16.... This is not so practical with centimeters. For example, I have a one foot ruler on my desk with 1/32" units on it which is just as useful as millimeters for any practical purposes.

    I can also fit a one foot ruler in my bag and still have a useful measurement that is neither too long nor too small to be practical.

    I can look at the monitor on my desk and "see" that it is about 16 inches tall, but if I did that in centimeters I would have to use "big" numbers such as 40 or 41 to make the same estimate. It's a lot easier to deal with smaller numbers than with big ones that only exist to accommodate the meter. This is probably why people are reluctant to say how tall they are in centimeters as opposed to feet. For example I am 5 feet 9 inches tall which is easy to relate to; just look at my height and try to divide up it into 5 3/4 of some "unit", that being a "feet". Then try to dividing my height up into 180 equal units (centimeters) by just eyeballing me. Inches and feet are just far more "intuitive" when it comes to dealing with real objects. It doesn't matter that there are 5280 feet in a mile. Unless you are an engineer you probably don't have any reason to consider how many meters are in a kilometer and probably don't ever give it much thought. Most people would say "1 and a half kilometers/miles" and never even think of having to convert to anything else, i.e. meters, feet, inches, Hersey Bars...

    Back to Mr. Orwell. What good is a liter by itself? I cannot drink a liter of milk in one sitting, drive very far on a liter of gasoline/petrol and it's not worth my time to carry a one liter bucket of water out to the sheep. The liter is just either too small or too much for any practical purposes....

    Weight,
    The gram is too small the kilogram is too much for practical purposes. There are 16 ounces in a pound. The gram is unless unless you are selling or buying drugs, so why have to use it in daily life?

    I don't want four-hundred fifty something grams of meat, just give me a pound. I might not want a kilograms of banana either, but a pound will do and if I want more than a pound or sugar I might take 2 or 3 of them plus 1 to 15 ounces. Why do I suddenly have to start dealing with hundreds of grams when 1 to 15 of something more "handy" will suffice?

    I won't even get into temperature......

    Anyway, I am not saying the metric system is a bad thing. It's great for science/engineering and it makes converting between units very easy, but most people do not perform the type of conversions in their daily lives that the metric system makes easy and forcing them to use individual units that are by themselves either too small or too large is rather pointless. Anyone who needs the metric system is already familiar with it. And as a previous poster put it in another thread, anyone who has a problem with it should be hit with a two-by-four.












    #31AuthorJohnny18 Oct 07, 04:00
    Comment
    There are many other problems I find with the metric system that make it unintuitive for daily use by most people.

    Really strange theory ...

    Die Literflasche/-packung ist ideal für Getränke. Eine Gallone ist viel zu viel, eine Flüssigunze viel zu wenig.

    Ein Meter entspricht gerade der Länge eines großen Schrittes, man kann also Längen leicht "abschreiten". Und wenn ich weiß, dass mein Swimmingpool 8m x 4m x 1.5 m misst, dann kann ich leicht ausrechnen, dass 48m³ Wasser hineinpassen. Das wiederum sind 48 000 Liter.

    Ein Zentimeter ist zwar kürzer, aber doch nicht weniger wirklichkeitsnah als ein Inch. Und hat den Vorteil, dass hundert davon wieder einen Meter ausmachen.

    Die Körpergrößenangabe 180 cm ist klarer und viel kürzer als "5 feet and a little less than 11 inches". Ein Zentimeter entspricht gerade der sinnvollen Toleranz bei solchen Angaben, ein Inch ist viel zu groß.

    Bei 0 Grad Celsius gefriert das Wasser, bei 100 Grad kocht es. Was könnte für das tägliche Leben sinnvoller sein, als eine solche Einteilung?

    Sorry, Johnny, aber deine Ausführungen kann ich beim besten Willen nicht nachvollziehen.
    #32Author dirk (236321) 18 Oct 07, 14:10
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt