Werbung - LEO ohne Werbung? LEO Pur
LEO

Sie scheinen einen AdBlocker zu verwenden.

Wollen Sie LEO unterstützen?

Dann deaktivieren Sie AdBlock für LEO, spenden Sie oder nutzen Sie LEO Pur!

 
  •  
  • Übersicht

    Sprachlabor

    I can only see vs I can see only

    Betrifft

    I can only see vs I can see only

    Kommentar
    My son wrote in his test you cansee only 10 houses and his teacher corrected it and wrote you can only see 10 houses. I think his sentence is correct. Don't you agree? Or, is a difference between the two sentences? Help needed. Thanks
    Verfasserscape (758285) 17 Nov. 11, 13:53
    Kommentar
    I think it's correct what your son wrote, but I agree with the teacher that it sounds better to say "You can only see.."
    #1Verfasser Nick (US) (735138) 17 Nov. 11, 14:11
    Kommentar
    Strictly speaking, both sentences are correct:
    You can only see ten houses - could mean ten houses and nothing else
    You can see only ten houses - means no more than ten houses, and whatever else there might be. The emphasis is on the number, though.
    #2Verfasser dude (253248) 17 Nov. 11, 14:15
    Kommentar
    "You can see only 10 houses" sounds stilted.
    #3VerfasserKinkyAfro (587241) 17 Nov. 11, 14:17
    Kommentar
    "the position of only in standard spoken English is not fixed, since ambiguity is avoided through sentence stress; in casual prose that keeps close to the rhythms of speech only is often placed where it would be in speech; and in edited and more formal prose only tends to be placed immediately before the word or words it modifies."
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/onl...

    The teacher was following the custom of "casual speech." Your son wrote "more formal prose."

    Theoretically, both are correct.
    #4Verfasser SD3 (451227) 17 Nov. 11, 14:22
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt