Warum nicht "several times" ?

Für mich hört sich "multiple times" (wenn es das denn erlaubterweise geben sollte) viel häufiger an als "several times".

I agree that multiple "sounds" more frequent than several.
Multiple is not wrong, but sounds really odd to me....
I would be more inclined to just say many times, or even numerous times ...

time and again?

Edit did not work .... Bubb :) :)

Edit to #3: A full sentence and context would of course be very helpful .....

Thank you!

#5: A full sentence and context would of course be very helpful .....
Then it will be possible to determine what "is getting lured" is supposed to mean. It will definitely need to be changed!

Funktioniert vielleicht auch "over and over again"?

as others have said, it all depends on the context; "repeatedly" could also be an option.

Edit: as for "lured": I agree it sounds a bit odd by itself, but maybe she was lured into the woods or some other place? Or maybe what's meant is she was seduced.

dude is right - wiederholt

No, she isn't! :)
She plays an Internet game which is broadcast live and she is getting lured with prices so that she won't stop doing stupid dares.

she keeps getting pulled back in with prizes/rewards?

So "getting lured" is wrong?

By itself, I'd say yes, as is "prices"; one usually gets lured to or into something, like a child getting lured into a car or someone getting lured into a trap.

'multiple times' is not incorrect, but a bit strange.

My main problem with your sentence is the tense, or rather the combination of tense + adverbial.

Suggestions:

is/gets lured numerous times
is/gets repeatedly lured
keeps getting lured
is constantly/always/continually/forever getting lured

However, as others have pointed out, 'lured' by itself won't do. Maybe substitute 'trapped'?