Werbung - LEO ohne Werbung? LEO Pur
LEO

Sie scheinen einen AdBlocker zu verwenden.

Wollen Sie LEO unterstützen?

Dann deaktivieren Sie AdBlock für LEO, spenden Sie oder nutzen Sie LEO Pur!

 
  •  
  • Betrifft

    Komma vor *because*?

    Kommentar
    Muß man immer vor *because* ein Komma setzen, wie im Deutschen vor *weil*?

    Der Arzt hat die Behandlung ambulant durchgeführt, weil im Krankenhaus keine Betten mehr frei waren.

    The doctor treated the patient in his office, because the hospital could accept no more stationary patients.

    Verfassertrehala13 Dez. 06, 11:39
    Kommentar
    In der Schule haben wir gelernt: Vor because kein Komma.
    #1VerfasserHans13 Dez. 06, 11:40
    Kommentar
    I have no idea what the rule is, but the comma splits the sentence up and makes it easy to read.
    #2VerfasserMarky13 Dez. 06, 17:27
    Kommentar
    http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/015.html

    because after negated verbs.  When because follows a negated verb phrase, it must be preceded by a comma when the because clause explains why the event did not occur. They didn't want her on the committee, because she was so outspoken means roughly "Her outspokenness was their reason for not wanting her on the committee." When there is no comma, the because clause is included in what is being negated. Thus They didn't want her on the committee because she was so outspoken implies that they may in fact have wanted her on the committee but for some reason other than her outspokenness.
    #3Verfasserdude13 Dez. 06, 17:39
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt