Werbung - LEO ohne Werbung? LEO Pur
LEO

Sie scheinen einen AdBlocker zu verwenden.

Wollen Sie LEO unterstützen?

Dann deaktivieren Sie AdBlock für LEO, spenden Sie oder nutzen Sie LEO Pur!

 
  •  
  • Betrifft

    sqm vs. m²

    Kommentar
    In an art catalog describing a media facade, is it preferable to use sqm or m² as the abbreviation for square meters?

    1,774 individually controlled fluorescent lamps on 1,350m² or
    1,774 individually controlled fluorescent lamps on 1,350 sqm
    VerfasserLaraUS (239207) 27 Feb. 07, 12:43
    Kommentar
    @LaraUS: korrekt ist "m²", und zwar mit Leerzeichen zwischen Maßzahl und Maßeinheit. Beispiel: 234 m².
    #1Verfasser Chris (AT) (237739) 27 Feb. 07, 12:58
    Kommentar
    Is there any difference between the two in this context?

    Oxford Style Guide:

    sq. m. = square metres (not used in scientific and technical work)

    "ha=hectares; sqm=square metre; sqft=square foot " http://www.chichester.gov.uk/documents/upload...

    "Redevelopment to provide 28566 sq.m. " http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/planning_decis...
    #2Verfasser CM2DD (236324) 27 Feb. 07, 13:16
    Kommentar
    In the art texts I have translated (catalogues, press releases etc)I have been told to use m² as Chris recommended. Perhaps sqm is more common for town planning (or other non-arty sources), in keeping with the links provided by CM2DD? Or maybe it really is just personal preference.
    #3Verfasser yackydar (264012) 27 Feb. 07, 13:54
    Kommentar
    My guess would be that it may be more for more prgamatic reasons, like typesetting & problems with superscripting the 2. Or perhaps sqm is intended to be easier for non-mathematicians t understand.
    #4Verfasser DW (EN) (241915) 05 Mär. 07, 15:25
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt