Werbung - LEO ohne Werbung? LEO Pur
LEO

Sie scheinen einen AdBlocker zu verwenden.

Wollen Sie LEO unterstützen?

Dann deaktivieren Sie AdBlock für LEO, spenden Sie oder nutzen Sie LEO Pur!

 
  •  
  • Betrifft

    long ago vs. a long time ago

    Kommentar
    Are both correct?

    Is there a difference in meaning?

    She passed away long ago.

    She passed away a long time ago.
    VerfasserGerd10122 Mai 07, 08:54
    Kommentar
    @Gerd - This is just my gut feeling - In your examples, if I used "long ago," I did'nt know her personally, since she lived way before my time. To my mind, "a long time ago" would signify that I had in fact known her.
    #1Verfasser Carly-AE (237428) 22 Mai 07, 09:14
    Kommentar
    In my opinion Gerd, you could get by with both in spoken english. AE and BE are very lenient (or tolerant) when it comes to spoken English. But, when it comes to writing, I would use 'a long time ago.' It sounds better and looks better on paper.
    #2VerfasserChichis22 Mai 07, 09:32
    Kommentar
    For AE I agree with Carly. The phrase "long ago and far away" indicates a time before I was born and a place a long distance from where I have ever lived. "Long ago" also sounds (to me) just a bit old-fashioned, almost as if I were introducing a story I had heard. "A long time ago" can also introduce the above ideas, but also carries the idea of "within my lifetime", which - to me - "long ago" doesn't bear. But as Chichis noted, both AE and BE are very forgiving when it comes to speech acts.
    #3Verfasser Robert -- US (328606) 23 Mai 07, 00:46
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt