Werbung
LEO

Sie scheinen einen AdBlocker zu verwenden.

Wollen Sie LEO unterstützen?

Dann deaktivieren Sie AdBlock für LEO, spenden Sie oder nutzen Sie LEO Pur!

 
  •  
  • Betrifft

    Datum

    Kommentar
    Aussprache folgender Daten???

    24 August 1997
    6th June 2003
    May 10, 2001
    2003-02-29
    Verfasserguenlemeli (683076) 27 Apr. 10, 19:14
    Kommentar
    British -
    the twenty-fourth of August nineteen ninety-seven
    the sixth of June two thousand and three
    May the 10th two thousand and one
    two thousand and three o two twenty-nine OR two thousand and three two twenty-nine
    Writing the date this way round in Britain is unusual in normal circumstances.
    29-02-2003 would be - twenty-nineth of the second two thousand and three.
    #1VerfasserK uk27 Apr. 10, 19:20
    Kommentar
    AE
    May 10, 2001
    "May tenth, two thousand (and) one"

    BE
    24 August 1997
    6th June 2003
    (see #1)

    AE
    2-29-03, 2/29/03
    "two twenty-nine oh-three"
    2-29-2003, 2/29/2003
    "two twenty-nine two thousand (and) three"

    BE
    29-2-2003, 29-2-03 (?)

    German
    2003-02-29

    Please don't use this form except in exclusively numeric contexts such as computer programming. In normal English, the year does not come first, and we do not use a leading zero before the month or the day.
    #2Verfasser hm -- us (236141) 27 Apr. 10, 19:45
    Kommentar
    I would like to know
    whether you should use st,nd, rd and th
    with dates (written language)
    or do you use the abbreviations only in the spoken language
    #3Verfasserguenlemeli (683076) 27 Apr. 10, 19:55
    Kommentar
    is this the american way of writing a date 23/9/2004

    and

    is this the British way of writing a date 23.9.2004

    this means
    slashes in AM E
    and
    dots in BR E

    is it possible to simplify it like that
    #4Verfasserguenlemeli (683076) 27 Apr. 10, 19:58
    Kommentar
    (There are really a lot of threads in the archive on this; did you try Search all / Suche in allen Foren?)

    When the date includes the year, writing the ordinal ending is wrong in AE, optional in BE.

    AE
    May 10, 2001
    (pronounced "May tenth"; but writing *10th would be wrong)

    BE
    10 May 2001
    (also sometimes:) 10th May 2001



    When the year is not mentioned, it's optional.

    AE
    The meeting is scheduled for May 10 / May 10th.
    (both pronounced "May tenth")

    BE (?)
    The meeting is scheduled for 10 May / 10th May.
    (both pronounced "the tenth of May")

    However, note that the ordinal ending is not more formal or more correct; if anything, it tends to look a little less formal or businesslike.

    Summary:
    Writing out the ordinal ending is never required.


    #5Verfasser hm -- us (236141) 27 Apr. 10, 20:09
    Kommentar
    re #4:

    Yes, slashes are typical in AE, and dots are not very typical in AE (except in frou-frou ultramodern typography), so they may be more BE. As far as I know, hyphens are acceptable in either.

    The order you give is wrong for AE, where we always write the month first.
    #6Verfasser hm -- us (236141) 27 Apr. 10, 20:12
    Kommentar
    thank you very much
    #7Verfasserguenlemeli (683076) 27 Apr. 10, 20:15
    Kommentar
    hm -- us's remarks on dots are true for BE too. BE like AE normally use slashes or hyphens.
    #8Verfasser amw (532814) 27 Apr. 10, 22:56
    Kommentar
    use -> uses
    #9Verfasser amw (532814) 27 Apr. 10, 22:57
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt