you could say that, maybe you got more context?

In an Interview Dr. Gemma Roberts talks about influential women in the past and in the present and that is what she says:
In history books we always read about men, but never about women. Although there were as many brilliant women as men, they are not mentioned in history books. The main reason for that is, that most of the history books are written by men. A lot of women not even learned writing.
In spite of that there were some influential women. These women say that they got a special support from their father in the childhood.
In present we can read a lot about famous women and we accept it as normal

Das ist der ganze Text. Ich weiß aber nicht ob das alles richtig englisch ist, ich bin nicht so gut im Texte schreiben ;)

Nur mal so als kurzer Vorschlag:

In an Interview, Dr. Gemma Roberts talks about influential women in the past and in the present, and this is what she says:
In history books we always read about men, but never about women. Although there were as many brilliant women as there were men, they are not mentioned in history books. The main reason for that is that most of the history books were written by men. A lot of women did not even learn how to write.
In spite of that there were some influential women. These women say they got special support from their fathers during the childhood.
These days, we can read a lot about famous women and we see it as normal.