Werbung
LEO

Sie scheinen einen AdBlocker zu verwenden.

Wollen Sie LEO unterstützen?

Dann deaktivieren Sie AdBlock für LEO, spenden Sie oder nutzen Sie LEO Pur!

 
  •  
  • Übersicht

    Übersetzung korrekt?

    B wie in Berlin (cont.) - B as in Berlin (cont.)

    Gegeben

    B wie in Berlin (cont.)

    Richtig?

    B as in Berlin (cont.)

    Quellen
    Beispiele/ Definitionen mit Quellen
    A for 'orses
    B for mutton
    C for 'th highlanders
    D for 'ential
    E for brick
    Kommentar
    Since this thread seems to have gone down the tubes (I think it was my last comment that killed it) I will put this here:

    IIRC it was tippyc who wrote something like "Unless I have missed something the previous guy [i.e. me] is crazy".
    Although the two alternatives are not mutually exclusive each other (and I tend to share Yossarian's view of being thought crazy), yes, you have missed something, though I can understand your confusion.
    My serious point was that when spelling out a word or reciting a spelling alphabet, you can say "A for . . ., B for . . ." etc.). As an illustration, I quoted from the Cockney alphabet, which -- though humorous -- does illustrate the point, and in fact requires the use of the preposition "for" (particularly for the letter 'C').
    (:-)
    VerfasserMikeE (236602) 10 Okt. 06, 23:04
    Vorschläge



    Kommentar
    Oops! Please delete "each other".
    An edit function would be nice.
    The small boxes do seem to make it easy to miss editing mistakes.
    #1VerfasserMikeE (236602) 11 Okt. 06, 07:18
    Vorschläge



    Kommentar
    MikeE - thanks for reminding me of this alphabet, I'd sort of forgotten about it.
    Your link doesn't contain very much information, so for anyone who might be interested in the complete list:
    The definitive Cockney Alphabet
    #2VerfasserMarianne (BE)11 Okt. 06, 08:40
    Vorschläge



    Kommentar
    Well, that contained even less information - trying again:
    The definitive Cockney Alphabet
    #3VerfasserMarianne (BE)11 Okt. 06, 08:45
    Vorschläge



    Kommentar
    Sorry about the Wikipedia link.
    It appears that LEO displays the link with the apostrophe but uses a link without an apostrophe or %27.
    #4VerfasserMikeE (236602) 11 Okt. 06, 16:08
    Vorschläge



    Kommentar
    "My serious point was that when spelling out a word or reciting a spelling alphabet, you can say "A for . . ., B for . . ." etc.)."

    I thought that saying "for" is only used when you try to explain the alphabet to child.
    "A is for..." explains where you can find "A".

    If you spell a word or recite the spelling alphabet, I'd say "'A' as in ..." or just say the word from the spelling alphabet, e.g. "Anton, Berta..." (sorry, don't know the English spelling alphabet - or anything beyond Anton and Berta from the German one, for that matter ;) ).
    #5VerfasserMoni12 Okt. 06, 11:49
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt