| Comment | "Really. "That wouldn't have been exactly the first thing that came to mind."
"Ah. "Which Buckingham Palace were you thinking of again?"
(-;
In another case where there really is some reason to take the argument or the speaker more seriously, if not the particular example, maybe
That's really pushing it. That's a little much. That's really over the top. That's an exaggeration. I think you're blowing things out of proportion. That comparison seems pretty forced / strained. I don't think that comparison really holds water / holds up. That comparison is out of place / inappropriate. That's really straining / that's a bit of a strain. (but not 'straining it,' I don't think)
If the comparison can't be taken seriously at all, you could just say it's ludicrous, ridiculous, silly, patently untrue ...
'Tenuous' seemed fine for the Mozart example, or a step further, maybe artificial, spurious, inauthentic ...
The last category might be where the comparison is actually beyond the pale, appalling, pathological -- like the example with Tadic in the other thread comparing Serbians to real catastrophe victims. In that case you wouldn't even dignify the statement by responding to it, or would just say that it's highly offensive and utterly irrational.
|
|---|