Advertising - LEO without ads? LEO Pur
LEO

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker.

Would you like to support LEO?

Disable your ad blocker for LEO or make a donation.

 
  •  
  • Forum home

    Language lab

    I can only see vs I can see only

    Topic

    I can only see vs I can see only

    Comment
    My son wrote in his test you cansee only 10 houses and his teacher corrected it and wrote you can only see 10 houses. I think his sentence is correct. Don't you agree? Or, is a difference between the two sentences? Help needed. Thanks
    Authorscape (758285) 17 Nov 11, 13:53
    Comment
    I think it's correct what your son wrote, but I agree with the teacher that it sounds better to say "You can only see.."
    #1Author Nick (US) (735138) 17 Nov 11, 14:11
    Comment
    Strictly speaking, both sentences are correct:
    You can only see ten houses - could mean ten houses and nothing else
    You can see only ten houses - means no more than ten houses, and whatever else there might be. The emphasis is on the number, though.
    #2Author dude (253248) 17 Nov 11, 14:15
    Comment
    "You can see only 10 houses" sounds stilted.
    #3AuthorKinkyAfro (587241) 17 Nov 11, 14:17
    Comment
    "the position of only in standard spoken English is not fixed, since ambiguity is avoided through sentence stress; in casual prose that keeps close to the rhythms of speech only is often placed where it would be in speech; and in edited and more formal prose only tends to be placed immediately before the word or words it modifies."
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/onl...

    The teacher was following the custom of "casual speech." Your son wrote "more formal prose."

    Theoretically, both are correct.
    #4Author SD3 (451227) 17 Nov 11, 14:22
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt