Advertising - LEO without ads? LEO Pur
LEO

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker.

Would you like to support LEO?

Disable your ad blocker for LEO or make a donation.

 
  •  
  • Topic

    Abbreviation of "number"

    Comment
    At school, I was taught that one should always abbreviate "number" with "No.", using a capital N.

    My question is: Why?

    And another one is: Is that correct?
    AuthorDer Englaender (542881) 20 Nov 11, 12:10
    Comment
    It stands for numero (ablative of Latin numerus), meaning "in number", "to the number of", "with the number", etc. Obviously it's treated as a nominative in English and pluralized accordingly: "Nos", "nos"

    I've no idea why it was written with a capital, but AFAIK the rule is no longer universally observed anyway. I usually write no., nos.
    #1Author captain flint (782544) 20 Nov 11, 12:24
    Comment
    No.

    (That's the answer to you second question.)

    It's short for 'numero'. There's no need for a capital. Strictly speaking, in BE usage it shouldn't have a dot after it either (but it nearly always does).
    #2Author escoville (237761) 20 Nov 11, 12:26
    Comment
    Good point. I hereby rescind the rogue dot after "no." in #1.
    #3Author captain flint (782544) 20 Nov 11, 12:33
    Comment
    Thanks folks! Just one of the many things I was taught incorrectly... another example is "Look to the right before crossing the road." - doesn't seem to work very well in Germany...
    #4AuthorDer Englaender (542881) 20 Nov 11, 12:51
    Comment
    #2
    I wouldn't say a "rule" proposed by Fowler that is widely, but not universally, followed in Britain for some words (like "Mr") but not for others (like "edn." and "No.") means that the dot should necessarily be omitted.
    #5AuthorMikeE (236602) 20 Nov 11, 14:30
    Comment
    @ 4, wenn Du's bis zur Mitte der Fahrbahn geschafft hast, schon!
    #6Author manni3 (305129) 20 Nov 11, 14:33
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt