Advertising - LEO without ads? LEO Pur
LEO

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker.

Would you like to support LEO?

Disable your ad blocker for LEO or make a donation.

 
  •  
  • Topic

    stay vs live

    Comment
    Hi. I always thought that I use "live" when I talk about my permanent place to live and "stay" when I talk about certain periodes, for example stay with friends, stay at a hotel. Now, I read in a brochure about language courses "you can live in a hotel or live with a family". Is it only regional use of live or are live and stay synonyms?

    Thanks in advance and have a nice weekend
    AuthorSybille17 Jan 10, 11:45
    Comment
    How long is the language course? If it's relatively long, then "live" makes sense. I.e., the longer the amount of time, the more one would tend to use "live" instead of "stay". I would not say they are synonyms, of course it always depends on context!
    #1Authormeep17 Jan 10, 11:59
    Comment
    Sybille: Your first thoughts were right. To live somewhere generally implies some degree of permanence. Normally, people do not "live" in hotels. As you say, people generally "stay" at hotels. "Live with a family" is, I think, sometimes used in advertising texts. It conjures up the idea of becoming a temporary "member" of the family.
    #2Author SD3 (451227) 17 Jan 10, 12:25
    Comment
    Usage varies around the world. I once met a girl from Singapore who said "We stay in a house" (i.e. not a flat).
    #3Author escoville (237761) 17 Jan 10, 12:54
    Comment
    @3: Well, if that was the entire sentence, didn't she get the tense wrong as well? ;-)
    #4Author SD3 (451227) 17 Jan 10, 13:50
    Comment
    Note that in Scotland, stay is commonly used to mean live, e.g.:

    Q: Where do you stay?
    A: In Glasgow

    In England (and elsewhere) this would have to be: "Where do you live?" (or "Where are you staying?" if the context is perceived as limited in time / not permanent), unless the questioner is asking about A's normal accommodation when A is away on business trips, for example.
    #5AuthorKinkyAfro (587241) 17 Jan 10, 14:11
    Comment
    for one thing, people can also live in hotels; lots of them do, in fact.

    secondly, I think if your life takes place in mostly one particular environment, especially in a familial environment (and you're staying with this family for longer than say a week), there's nothing wrong IMO with saying "live" for that period.
    #6Author dude (253248) 17 Jan 10, 16:25
    Comment
    @6: Yes, some people live in hotels. Some famous people, I believe, have lived for years in hotels. Where I live, some homeless families live in hotels at the expense of the state. Hotels are, in my opinion, not normal permanent housing for the overwhelming majority of people. Therefore, I would say that the overwhelming majority of people do not "live" in hotels. When you say "lots of them do, in fact," how many would that be in your experience?
    #7Author SD3 (451227) 17 Jan 10, 16:40
    Comment
    @SD3

    No, her tense was right. She meant what I would mean by "We live in a house."
    #8Author escoville (237761) 17 Jan 10, 17:00
    Comment
    @SD3: Having lived in a hotel myself once - in the distant past - and having known quite a few people at that time who also lived in hotels, I'd say the number of those people is probably a lot higher than the general public would assume. I have no statistics to back that up, of course, so I can only offer you my personal experience, limited though it may be.
    #9Author dude (253248) 17 Jan 10, 17:10
    Comment
    #8: Yes, I assumed that was what you meant. My comment was intended to be humorous - I even remembered to add a smiley!

    #10Author SD3 (451227) 17 Jan 10, 19:23
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt