| Comment | Yes, it should be 'the rise to independence.' The rest is grammatically okay, just not especially interesting.
I would assume that your paper is not just looking at the film as background, but is in fact analyzing its treatment of the topic, comparing its perspective with what you know about the historical facts, or perhaps with previous films or depictions in books or plays or whatever. In general, an academic paper should never merely describe or summarize; it needs to express your own opinion or perception, your interpretation of the evidence. Ideally, the title should give the reader a hint about that judgment, that opinion, because it's going to be your thesis, the point you're arguing in the paper, the thing that will make readers want to read it.
So (without taking time to look up the film, which I've never heard of), I might suggest something more like
How grass-roots resistance brought freedom: The fragile path to Irish independence in "The Wind That Shakes the Barley" Propaganda masquerading as history: One-sided characters in "The Wind That Shakes the Barley" The dramatic power of "The Wind That Shakes the Barley": How a single film changed modern perceptions of the rise to Irish independence
Do you see how all those titles include a clue to the opinion of the writer, the angle the paper is going to pursue?
|
|---|