Advertising - LEO without ads? LEO Pur
LEO

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker.

Would you like to support LEO?

Disable your ad blocker for LEO or make a donation.

 
  •  
  • Topic

    have got vs. have vs. got

    Comment
    Hi - I would need some help here
    Is it correct that there is no difference between "I have got a brother" to "I have a brother"? Isn't the sentence "I have got a brother" in Present Perfect Simple Tense?
    Could I say "I got a brother", too?
    You see - I am really confused ...
    Thanks for any help !!!
    Authorkaktus_7 (724563) 07 Sep 10, 19:31
    Comment
    Possibly worth checking the archive on this. I've found at least one thread: related discussion: I have a dog bzw. I have got a dog
    #1AuthorKinkyAfro (587241) 07 Sep 10, 19:42
    Comment
    I got a brother = colloquial; in "formal" language it would mean you've received a brother (as in: your mom just gave birth to a boy)

    The difference between "have" and "have got" is negligible in AE (for the most part).
    #2Author dude (253248) 07 Sep 10, 19:44
    Comment
    I have got a brother is simple present, not present perfect simple (despite the "have").
    Both sentences mean the same.
    The difference comes with the question and the negative.
    He has a brother. Does he have a brother? He doesn't have a brother.
    (Has he a brother? and He hasn't a brother are theoretically possible, but they sound very odd.)
    He has got a brother. Has he got a brother? He hasn't got a brother.
    #3Authortomtom07 Sep 10, 20:07
    Comment
    thank you all for your answers but I am still not sure - sorry!
    Could I say in general:
    For possession I can use either "have" or "have got" (Present simple) but to express possession in all other tenses I can only use "have"?
    Sorry for bothering you !
    #4Authorkaktus_7 (724563) 07 Sep 10, 21:22
    Comment
    "In general", yes - although it's not quite as simple as that. (It never is.)
    #5Authortomtom07 Sep 10, 21:32
    Comment
    Thank you tomtom!!!
    #6Authorkaktus_7 (724563) 07 Sep 10, 21:46
    Comment
    Not in AE. For example, "he had" has a different meaning than "he had gotten" (and "he had got" isn't even used).
    #7Author dude (253248) 07 Sep 10, 21:47
    Comment
    No, it's not the same, at least not in "proper" grammar.

    You say "got" when you own something, or when you have a disease, and so on.

    I've got a car, I've got a bad cough.

    But you don't own your family, so it's

    I have a brother.

    But native speakers, particularly in British English, often ignore this rules, so it depends on whether you want to be absolutely correct, or go with the flow.
    #8AuthorMini Cooper (236699) 07 Sep 10, 21:49
    Comment
    That sounds a bit nit-picky to me, Mini Cooper.
    I have got a Mini = I actually own the car.
    I have a Mini = I have hired / stolen the car.
    ????
    #9Authortomtom07 Sep 10, 21:58
    Comment
    tom tom - it's very nit-picky, which is probably why it's (quite rightly, imo) so often ignored. I got it from a book - Business English Grammar by Paul Emerson (Grammar Guru).
    It's also very British. Americans tend to laugh at us when we say "got", at least all the Americans I know are always pulling my leg when I use is.

    By the way, I've got a Mini, too.
    I have a nice time driving it.




    #10AuthorMini Cooper (236699) 07 Sep 10, 22:23
    Comment
    As for AE: I've got you, babe. :-)
    #11Author dude (253248) 07 Sep 10, 22:34
    Comment
    dude - I've got you to understand! Lovely! (Or "terrific" as you would no doubt say.)
    #12AuthorMini Cooper (236699) 07 Sep 10, 22:41
    Comment
    That would be wrong, though, Mini. It should be "I got you to understand." Then it would be awesome! ;-)
    #13Author dude (253248) 07 Sep 10, 22:43
    Comment
    Awesome is an awesome word, dude!
    #14AuthorMini Cooper (236699) 07 Sep 10, 22:49
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt