Zeig uns ein Beispiel! . . .

Identification and quantification of variances between planned nominal values and incurred actual values for, e. g., quality, costs and schedules and identification of the causes...

Wieso hast Du überhaupt ein 'e.g.' drin, wenn Du doch
'... FOR a, b, c and d ...' auflistest?

The abbreviation e.g. is for the Latin exempli gratia, "for example." I.e., Latin id est, means "that is." They're not interchangeable. Both abbreviations should be followed by a comma.

http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/...

If you insist on using the abbreviation, perhaps “example given” will remind you to use e.g.,


http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/e.g.html

If the applicant is currently one of our tuition-paying clients, i.e., a student, the fee may be waived.

The best ingredients for pizza are green, e.g., spinach, artichokes, and green
The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/CMS_FAQ/A...


We need hm--us, our grammar expert. :-)

https://dict.leo.org/forum/viewGeneraldiscuss...

There is a recent thread on this; authorities give conflicting advice. I could not locate it readily but will try to find and post it later.

In the meantime, there is another issue to consider in your example. I suspect very few Americans, seeing e.g., would read "exempli gratiae;" some would just read the initals as is; and a good many would read "for example." So your example sentence would by them be read:
... values for, for example, quality ...
Might I reccommend rephrasing to avoid the possibility of the reduplicated "for"?

Possibly: etc. at the end of the list
--but then your sentence might end with an abbreviation, viz. etc., something recently advised against in a recent LEO thread.
or: e.g. --> such things as
of: e.g. --> , among other things,
If they style is very formal, the use of "things" may be objectionable, in which case you mightbe able to substitute an appropriate noun for "things."

Sorry, I'm not having any success in creating the link to the following thread:


selbst geschriebener Text...viele Fehler??
Hallo lieber User, ich muss u...
Grull
06 Mar 07
07 Mar 07 20:52



It is currently on page 7 of the Sprachlabor list.
Conflicting authorities on the use of punctuation surrounding e.g. may be found in the latter half of the thread.

test
related discussion: selbst geschriebener Text...viele Fehler??

Under the above link, See Verfasser Nr. 8.

Thanks, me1. What's the method?

Go to page 7, click on thread (selbst geschriebener Text...viele Fehler??) highlight the URL, press "Ctrl" "c" to copy, and then press "Ctrl" "v" to paste. (into LEO)

Good luck.

related discussion: selbst geschriebener Text...viele Fehler??

another test

Lost in translation (horrible errors)



...living and learning.

yet another test

related discussion: Lost in translation (horrible errors)

@All:
Apologies for trying your patience, at least in this context.

@me1:
Yours especially. Much obliged.

Congratulations! :-)

You're welcome.