Once again, my thoughts are congruent with Miss G's, point for point.
The American Heritage Dict. has a long usage note about this point:
http://www.bartleby.com/61/51/D0035100.htmland Garner's Dict. of Mod. American Usage has a column and a half about it, which generally follows Miss G's and the usage notes above. Select excerpts that offer something new:
"In one particular context, though, data is rarely treated as a singular: when it begins a clause and is not precede by the definite article. E.g. 'Data over the lst two years suggest that the rate at which gay men get AIDS has finally begun to falten out.
_Datum_, the 'true' singular, is still sometimes used when a single piece of information is referred to..." with more examples following. And again:
"Because _data_ can be either a count noun or a mass noun, both _many_ data and _much_ data are correct..." again with examples.
Garner refers to 'data' as a SKUNKED TERM, saying "As a historian of the English language once put it, 'A student with one year of Latin [knows] that _data_ and _phenomena_ are plural.' And that's what makes the term skunked: few people use it as a plural, yet many know that it techinically is a plural. Whatever you do, if you use data in a context in which its number becomes known, you'll bother some of your readers. Perhaps 50 years from now--maybe sooner, maybe later--the term will no longer be skunked: eerybody will accept it as a collective. But not yet."
These are only the highlights, he has more to say. I recommend this usage book to anyone interested in the fine points of usage.