Advertising - LEO without ads? LEO Pur
LEO

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker.

Would you like to support LEO?

Disable your ad blocker for LEO or make a donation.

 
  •  
  • Forum home

    English missing

    The difference between irrespectful and disrespectful?

    Subject

    The difference between irrespectful and disrespectful?

    [Schweiz]
    Sources
    6. Her remark about his family was impolite and irrespectful.(Incorrect)

    Her remark about his family was impolite and disrespectful. (Correct)
    Comment
    I don't understand exactly what the difference between these two words is.
    AuthorBuygymake27 Oct 09, 09:30
    Comment
    I'm not sure "irrespectful" is a word in the first place.

    Irresponsible exists, though.
    #1Authorspinatwachtel27 Oct 09, 09:32
    Comment
    and irrespective ... :)
    #2AuthorJohn27 Oct 09, 09:38
    Comment
    "Irrespectful" doesn't exist

    "disrespectful" is the word


    "Irrespective" = regardless of (abgesehen von / ungeachtet)

    #3Authormike27 Oct 09, 09:39
    Comment
    There is no "difference"; "irrespectful" is not a word.
    #4Authordstone27 Oct 09, 09:40
    Comment
    "irrespectful" is actually listed in OED ("rare") and substantiated by only two quotes (1678 & 1897).
    #5AuthorPhillipp27 Oct 09, 09:42
    Comment
    @ Phillipp:

    I was afraid that might be the case - maybe one should never assert a particular word doesn't exist in English.

    BTW - what's the definition?

    #6Authormike27 Oct 09, 09:51
    Comment
    irrespectful (rare)

    Not respectful, disrespectful.

    1678 Trans. Crt. Spain 46 The refusal and the letter are criminal and irrespectful proceedings. 1897 Sat. Rev. LXXXIII. 183/2 The most outrageous and irrespectful democrats in modern Europe.

    [OED]
    #7AuthorPhillipp27 Oct 09, 09:53
    Comment
    mike, that's why I wrote "I'm not sure..."...I just knew someone would have a 2000-page dictionary from 1865 which would still include "irrespectful".
    If you play Scrabble for a while you realise that in English, if you can pronounce it, it probably exists. Plus plenty more words which you can't pronounce...
    Phillipp, if the last quote is from 1897, it's high time it was used again, and what better place than an English essay for homework in year 5 at a German grammar school, eh? :-)
    #8Authorspinatwachtel27 Oct 09, 09:56
    Comment
    Oh dear. Too little work this morning, spinatwachtel?
    #9AuthorPhillipp27 Oct 09, 09:57
    Comment
    Phillipp - ? Did I miss an insult on my part that would warrant being insulted back?
    #10Authorspinatwachtel27 Oct 09, 10:02
    Comment
    spinatwachtel, if you're going to have a rant then for heaven's sake say something that people don't already know. I was not suggesting that anyone use the word.
    #11AuthorPhillipp27 Oct 09, 10:05
    Comment
    I'd say #8 at best qualifies as a waffle, but a rant?
    Oh well, so glad this is all virtual.
    #12Authorspinatwachtel27 Oct 09, 10:14
    Comment
    #13AuthorPhillipp27 Oct 09, 10:21
    Comment
    It qualifies at most as 'ironical exaggeration'. I can't see any rants here.
    #14AuthorJohn27 Oct 09, 11:44
    Comment
    I think spinatwachtel was just teasing, Phillipp. Afeter all, I'm sure she read your post higher up about it being quoted only twice, etc. No need for ruffled feathers on either side...

    and spinatwachtel, re #8: ;-)
    #15Author the kat (387522) 27 Oct 09, 12:05
    Comment
    (*preparingplateofhumblepieforknapkintumblerofwater*)

    SORRY for being so damned snappish yesterday, spinatwachtel! ;-(((

    Here's a virtual strelizia for you :-)))

    (I got up on the wrong side of bed AND had too much work of the wrong kind!)
    #16AuthorPhillipp28 Oct 09, 14:31
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt