Advertising - LEO without ads? LEO Pur
LEO

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker.

Would you like to support LEO?

Disable your ad blocker for LEO or make a donation.

 
  •  
  • Subject

    Satz mit drei Worten

    Sources
    will sagen: ....warum würde er das Ereignis in einem Satz mit drei Worten flüchtig erwähnen.

    = ...why would he touch on this event in a three words sentence?"
    oder ="why would he touch on this event in a sentence made up of three words?"

    Was stimmt davon?
    AuthorAndi01 Jul 10, 11:31
    Suggestiona three word sentence
    Comment
    word ohne -s
    #1Author mad (239053) 01 Jul 10, 11:32
    Comment
    ... in a three-word sentence
    #2AuthorEverytime01 Jul 10, 11:33
    Comment
    Ergänzung noch: Der zweite Satz ist nicht falsch, aber etwas zu kompliziert ausgedrückt für den alltäglichen Gebrauch.
    #3Author mad (239053) 01 Jul 10, 11:34
    Comment
    Why would he mention this in passing.
    #4AuthorBill01 Jul 10, 12:15
    Suggestionthree words' sentence
    Comment
    I would leave the "s"
    #5AuthorKenneth01 Jul 10, 12:54
    Comment
    Ich bin auch für three-word sentence ( s. auch four-letter word), habe aber noch einen ergänzenden Hinweis für den deutschen Satz:
    es heißt hier Wörter und nicht Worte!



    #6Author wisegirl (457972) 01 Jul 10, 12:58
    Suggestionthree words
    Comment
    Why would he only waste three words on this event?

    OR

    Why would he waste so very few words on this event?

    @Kenneth: Sorry, but "three words' sentence" is wrong. "Three-word sentence" is correct.
    #7AuthorGum E. Bear01 Jul 10, 13:05
    Comment
    "in a sentence of three words"

    ginge auch.
    #8AuthorPhillipp01 Jul 10, 13:07
    Suggestionthree word
    #9Author Dussel (656230) 01 Jul 10, 14:07
    Suggestionokay
    #10AuthorKen01 Jul 10, 14:36
    Comment
    must have
    #11Author Dussel (656230) 02 Jul 10, 13:43
     
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  
 
 
 
 
 ­ automatisch zu ­ ­ umgewandelt